"Doomsday Seed Vault" in the Arctic

‘If you control the oil you control the country; if you control food, you control the population.’ Henry Kissinger

No project of the Bill & Melinda Gas Foundation is more interesting at the moment than a curious project in one of the world’s most remote spots, Svalbard. Bill Gates is investing millions in a seed bank on the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean, some 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole. This article is a must read and describes how the seed vault is related to:

Terminator Seeds:
Terminator is an ominous technology by which a patented commercial seed commits ‘suicide’ after one harvest. Control by private seed companies is total. Such control and power over the food chain has never before in the history of mankind existed. Monsanto and th US government own the patents to Genetic Use Restriction Technology (GURT) seeds.

Spermicidal GMO crops:
A small California biotech company, Epicyte, in 2001 announced the development of genetically engineered corn which contained a spermicide which made the semen of men who ate it sterile.

Of course, I'm just a raving "New World Order" fanatic so don't worry. I'm sure spermicidal food and terminator seeds will be used for the good of humanity.

Church Bodies in USA

I thought this was pretty interesting.

A laughable Democracy

New Hampshire Results: And why is this not making the mainstream media? Obviously the game is rigged. And the MSM is in on it. Democracy? Yeah, right.

Bang a Drum: People 1 to 100

I lament my future of aging. Wait until you see the 100 year old lady and you will understand.

CNN Mentions NH Vote Fraud Possibility

Are People Retarded?

Okay, last night I sat through the NH primary in a disgusted funk. At first I though people were plain retarded, especially when I saw CNN's exit polling say "Stay in Iraq 100 years" McCain won the majority of people who said they disproved of the Iraq war. I mean, how can people live with themselves with such cognitive dissonance - disapprove of the war, vote for someone who says they are happy if it lasts another 100 years?

Then I realized that there was a reason the voting didn't match up with the polling. The voting was fixed. Plain and simple. People were up in arms on the net saying their town, were they voted for Ron Paul, registered zero RP votes in the official tally.

ABC carried a story saying that it was a huge scandal how the polling was so wrong, Obama was clearly headed for a victory. ABC automatically assumed their polls were wrong, but I suspect the Clinton vote was fixed as well.

• Diebold favors Hillary, hand count for Obama - software on Diebold machines is proprietary and no wonder, the machine votes favored Clinton over Obama. Obama wins the hand counted votes.
• Voting Machines favor Rudy Giuliani over Ron Paul - Table shows that Ron Paul beats Rudy in hand counted ballots (at least the ones reported and not "lost"... see below)
• Ron Paul cheated out of all his votes in Suttton, NH - "What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer." Where else did this happen?
• New Hampshire's Polling Fiasco - "It is simply unprecedented for so many polls to have been so wrong. We need to know why." ABC News

Ron Paul was polling in the high teens and gets only 8% of the vote. Hmmm...I guess if Americans are happy with machines telling them how they voted, they deserve to live with the results. Good luck paying for your 100 years in Iraq!

Another glaring example of fake news on Fox

The same man appears in two supposed "random sample" post debate focus groups. In one case he supports McCain. In another he supports Romney. Anyone who still thinks Fox News is a credible news source should see a psychiatrist.

Iowa Voter Fraud?

Being the political geek that I am, I actually watched the whole evening on Jan 3 when the votes were being reported on CNN. I noted these suspicious occurrences:

• It took the GOP vote much longer than the Democrats to come in even though it was a straight vote count exercise and not a time consuming caucus as was the case for the Democrats. Vote reporting delays are suspicious because it leaves time for nefarious activity.
• At one point in the evening Rudy Giuliani's vote total jumped up after taking 50% of one county and then fell 3000 votes a few minutes later when he was said to have 5% of the county. What's up with that?
• Only 95% of the votes ever came in. To this moment, CNN's website states that 95% of the votes have been tallied. What happened to the other 6000 votes? MSNBC says 98% reporting but still quotes the same candidate %'s as CNN. There are 65 precincts missing.
  
• Ron Paul vote was actually 9.99% using the vote counts on CNN's website. This means that he didn't quite meet Fox New's requirement for NH debate participation. This is so darn close it is suspicious.

If one puts their conspiracy hat on a scenario can be imagined where the missing 6000 votes were actually dumped Ron Paul votes, and therefore the reason the GOP vote took so long to come in was that his vote was "managed" down to just below 10%. If all 6000 missing votes were his he would have come in 3rd with 14% of the vote. You think voter fraud doesn't happen? See below post.

Why I will never vote on a machine

Christmas 2007

Here are some pics from our Christmas family get together: