Iowa Voter Fraud?
Being the political geek that I am, I actually watched the whole evening on Jan 3 when the votes were being reported on CNN. I noted these suspicious occurrences:
- It took the GOP vote much longer than the Democrats to come in even though it was a straight vote count exercise and not a time consuming caucus as was the case for the Democrats. Vote reporting delays are suspicious because it leaves time for nefarious activity.
- At one point in the evening Rudy Giuliani's vote total jumped up after taking 50% of one county and then fell 3000 votes a few minutes later when he was said to have 5% of the county. What's up with that?
- Only 95% of the votes ever came in. To this moment, CNN's website states that 95% of the votes have been tallied. What happened to the other 6000 votes? MSNBC says 98% reporting but still quotes the same candidate %'s as CNN. There are 65 precincts missing.
- Ron Paul vote was actually 9.99% using the vote counts on CNN's website. This means that he didn't quite meet Fox New's requirement for NH debate participation. This is so darn close it is suspicious.
If one puts their conspiracy hat on a scenario can be imagined where the missing 6000 votes were actually dumped Ron Paul votes, and therefore the reason the GOP vote took so long to come in was that his vote was "managed" down to just below 10%. If all 6000 missing votes were his he would have come in 3rd with 14% of the vote. You think voter fraud doesn't happen? See below post.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home